Formula 1 is beloved by fans worldwide, but its racing decisions often spark debate. Recently, a delay in confirming the Canadian Grand Prix results brought renewed focus on how officials, known as stewards, manage tricky situations. Fans want races to be fair and decisions to be clear. So, how can F1 make its stewarding system better and more trusted?
Current Problems in F1 Stewarding
Stewards in F1 are people who decide if drivers break the rules. They look at camera footage, listen to reports, and make judgments quickly. But this job is hard. The recent Canadian race showed how delays can cause frustration. It took over five hours to finalize the results because officials had to check on incidents and verify protests. This delay makes fans and teams doubt the fairness of decisions.
Another issue is who the stewards are. Since 2010, some stewards are ex-F1 drivers, which helps them understand racing better. However, these volunteers are not paid. Sometimes, they might make decisions based on limited information or personal views. Recently, Derek Warwick, a respected ex-driver and steward, was suspended after giving an interview to a gambling website, raising questions about neutrality and professionalism. These incidents highlight the need to improve how stewarding is handled to restore trust.
How Can F1 Make Stewarding Better?
Experts suggest several solutions to improve stewarding in F1. First, hiring full-time, paid stewards could bring consistency. When officials have steady employment and training, they can focus better and make quicker, fairer decisions. Although the FIA, F1’s governing body, has said they cannot afford full-time staff, many believe this investment would pay off in fairness and reputation.
Another idea is to use better technology. Modern video review systems, like multiple angle cameras and real-time data, can help stewards see incidents clearly. For example, during the Canadian GP, Mercedes provided data showing driver Russell was obeying the safety car rules. Better tech allows faster decisions, reducing delays and appeals.
Race organizers can also prioritize incidents. Focusing first on cases that directly affect the race winner or podium finish makes sense logically and commercially. Delaying decisions on minor issues prevents unnecessary confusion. Additionally, increasing protest fees could dissuade frivolous claims, saving time for officials and teams.
Lastly, the FIA is working on reforms. Starting in 2025, they plan to increase the number of stewards for high-pressure races, adding more objectivity. There are also discussions about creating a professional stewarding team, similar to other sports, which would have full-time staff dedicated to fairness in racing.
Efforts are underway to make stewarding more transparent and effective. Fans, drivers, and teams all want a sport where rules are clear, decisions are quick, and trust is restored. Advances in technology, proper staffing, and better procedures seem to be the way forward. With these changes, Formula 1 can aim for a future where officiating is as exciting and fair as the race itself.
